Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alibek Kachmazov vs Ji Sung Nam Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kachmazov vs Nam analysis and find out who is favored!
Alibek Kachmazov vs Ji Sung Nam Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kachmazov 1 - 0 Nam
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kachmazov has won 48.47% of points on his second serve, while Nam has won 45.09%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kachmazov, in recent form, has won 48.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nam has won 52.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.08% and 33.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kachmazov has saved 65.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nam has saved 57.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kachmazov has won 59.15% of matches played (W/L 42/ 29), with Nam winning 44.44% (W/L 12/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kachmazov has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 73/ 31), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 21/ 22). Nam has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 230/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kachmazov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.45% of matches (W/L 27/ 20), where as Nam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.83% of matches (W/L 11/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kachmazov winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kachmazov winning 2 and Nam winning 0. The last match between Kachmazov and Nam was at the Gwangju Challenger, 17-04-2024, Second, Hard with Alibek Kachmazov getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:32.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kachmazov and Nam have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kachmazov winning 0 times and Nam 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kachmazov winning 0, and Nam 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kachmazov has played against opponents with an average rank of 284.08 while Nam has played against players with an average rank of 330.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kachmazov has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nam has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kachmazov has converted 42.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nam has converted 35.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kachmazov 1 - 0 Nam
269
Rank
248
High
21
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
714
Rank
236
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
61% (168-106)
Career Total W/L
56% (277-214)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
38% (3-5)
$30,230
Career Prize Money
$1,445
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alibek Kachmazov | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:32 | 1:25:32 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (37/72) | 57% (29/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (26/37) | 55% (16/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (16/35) | 41% (9/22) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (26/51) | 42% (30/72) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alibek Kachmazov | Ji Sung Nam |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 38% (3/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (36/28) | 33% (6/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (317/286) | 43% (72/96) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 43% (3/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.19 |
| Aces Total | 139 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 81 | 31 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:47 | 1:41:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 221.69 | 186.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (1134/2015) | 59% (313/532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (809/1134) | 67% (209/313) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (427/881) | 44% (96/219) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (85/202) | 37% (19/52) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (793/1965) | 38% (216/569) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (12/9) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 38% (3/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 76% (17/13) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (17/3) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (9/2) | 17% (6/1) |
Alibek Kachmazov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
6
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Adam Walton
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
44 of
80)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
22%
(
8 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Seong Chan Hong
54%
(
55 of
102)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
6-1 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Luke Saville
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
James McCabe
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Hiroki Moriya
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
120)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ji Sung Nam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Shintaro Imai
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Ji Sung Nam
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Otto Virtanen
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Ji Sung Nam
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Masamichi Imamura
Player
Ji Sung Nam
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
79 of
122)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
79)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
53 of
122)
112
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Bolt
Player
Ji Sung Nam
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Ji Sung Nam
57%
(
76 of
134)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
29 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
57 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
121
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kachmazov Vs Nam Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
